General Medicine Assignment 2
Question 1: Competency tested for Peer to peer review and assessment
:
Please go through one student's entire answer paper from this link, the
one who is closest to your own roll number :
http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2021/07/2019-batch-medicine-department-online.html?m=1
and share your peer review of each answer with your qualitative insights
into what was good or bad about the answer.
Answer 1: Link chosen- https://seemalaanjali123.blogspot.com/?m=1
Peer review:
·
Answer 1: Answer has not been clearly labelled.
Patient history has been taken into account for provisional diagnosis. Proper
justification of diagnosis is given. Diagrams have been inserted where
necessary. In Patient care has been recorded. Drugs used have been written.
Drug function and mechanism of action have not been written.
· Answer 2: Not attempted
· Answer 3: The disease has been identified and defined. Pathology of the
disease has also been explained well.
· Answer 4: All investigations done have been listed. Drugs and reason for
usage has been written however mechanism is not.
· Answer 5: Accurate feedback has been given.
· Overall: the questions should also have been written for convenience of
the examiner. Points should have been labelled and differentiated in a more
readable manner. Other than that, all attempted questions have been answered
satisfactorily.
·
Question 2: Share the link to your own
case report of a patient that you connected with and engaged while capturing
his/her sequential life events before and after the illness and clinical and
investigational images along with your discussion of that case.
Answer 2: https://shaardul124.blogspot.com/2021/07/3rd-sem-general-medicine-e-log.html
Question 3: (Testing
peer review competency of the examinees): Please go through the cases in the
links shared above and provide your critical appraisal of the captured data in
terms of completeness, correctness and ability to provide useful leads to
analyse the diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties around the cases shared.
Answer 3:
1.
AKI- https://laharikantoju.blogspot.com/2021/07/58-year-old-male-patient-elog-lahari.html?m=1
a.
Completeness-
Rigorous and complete history has been taken except height, weight, BMI and BSA
measurements, which are lacking. All investigations have been listed, and only
values of concern have been written down which is convenient, photos of
radiographs have also been inserted. Provisional diagnoses have been listed.
Treatment plan has been included with doctor’s instructions and drugs. However,
the reason for administration of drugs is missing.
b.
Correctness- All
the information seems to be in order.
c.
Ability to
provide useful leads to analyse the diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties
around the case- Leads are offered for further investigation and research in
the provisional diagnosis.
2.
CKD- https://krupalatha54.blogspot.com/2021/07/a-49-yr-old-female-with-generalized.html?m=1
a.
Completeness-
Rigorous and complete history has been taken. All investigations have been
listed, and only values of concern have been written down which is convenient,
photos of radiographs have also been inserted. Provisional diagnoses have been
listed. Treatment plan has been included with doctor’s instructions
b.
Correctness- all
information seems to be in order.
c.
Ability to
provide useful leads to analyse diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties- Leads
are offered for further investigation and research in the provisional
diagnosis.
3.
Acute onset
CKD: https://srinaini25.blogspot.com/2021/07/srinaini-roll-no-33-3rd-semester-this.html
a)
Completeness-
Rigorous and complete history has been taken. All investigations have been listed,
and only values of concern have been written down which is convenient, photos
of radiographs have also been inserted. Provisional diagnoses have been listed.
Treatment plan has been included with doctor’s instructions
b)
Correctness-
all information seems to be in order.
c)
Ability to
provide useful leads to analyse diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties- Leads
are offered for further investigation and research in the provisional
diagnosis.
4.
Coma and
renal failure: https://ananyapulikandala106.blogspot.com/2021/06/a-35yr-old-female-elog.html
a.
Completeness-
Rigorous and complete history has been taken. All investigations have been
listed, and only values of concern have been written down which is convenient,
photos of radiographs have also been inserted. Provisional diagnoses have been
listed. Treatment plan has been included with doctor’s instructions
b.
Correctness-
all information seems to be in order.
c.
Ability to
provide useful leads to analyse diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties- Leads
are offered for further investigation and research in the provisional
diagnosis.
Question 4:
Testing scholarship competency of the examinees (ability to read
comprehend, analyse, reflect upon, and discuss captured patient cantered data
as in their 'original' answers to the assignment for May 2021):
Please analyse the above linked patient data by first preparing a problem
list for each patient (based on the shared data) and then discuss the
diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty around solving those problems. Also
include the review of literature around sensitivity and specificity of the
diagnostic interventions mentioned and same around efficacy of the therapeutic
interventions mentioned for each patient.
Answer 4:
1.
AKI- https://laharikantoju.blogspot.com/2021/07/58-year-old-male-patient-elog-lahari.html?m=1
a.
Problem list-
i. Lower abdominal pain
ii. Burning micturition
iii. Lower back pain
iv. Dribbling of urine
v. Decrease in urine output
vi. Fever
vii. Shortness of breath
viii.
Elevated
serum creatinine
b.
Literature
review around sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis- serum creatinine has
90% specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing AKI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3695762/
c.
Literature
review around efficacy of therapeutic interventions- Among pharmacologic agents, mannitol appears to have a positive prophylactic
effect in kidney transplantation. There are no other significant beneficial
effects of diuretics for prophylaxis or as treatment in early or established
ARF. Of vasoactive agents, there is a relatively small amount of data
suggesting that diltiazem may have a positive prophylactic effect in kidney
transplantation, and dopamine possibly is beneficial early in the evolutionary
phase of ARF. Atrial natriuretic peptide and calcium channel blockers may have
beneficial effects in established disease. No other pharmacologic interventions
are supported by substantial data. There is no clear evidence that one form of
nutritional therapy has advantages over others, but some level of amino acid
supplementation in addition to basic energy replacement is supported by the
overall data. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7573008/
2.
CKD- https://krupalatha54.blogspot.com/2021/07/a-49-yr-old-female-with-generalized.html?m=1
a.
Problem list-
i. Muscle aches
ii. Generalised weakness
iii. Pallor- dimorphic anaemia
iv. Elevated serum creatinine
v. Elevated blood urea
vi. Pus in urine
vii. Diastolic dysfunction
viii.
Mild to
moderate suppression of all bone marrow cell lines
ix. Plasma cell dyscarasia
x. M band in electrophoresis
b.
Literature
review around sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis- eGFR <45 mL/min of 28% and a specificity of 94%. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894343/
c.
Literature review around efficacy of therapeutic
interventions- RAS blockade with
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor
blockers (ARBs) is the cornerstone therapy to reduce proteinuria, CKD
progression, and cardiovascular risk. Renin inhibitor therapy is useful for individuals
intolerant to above therapy. Spironolactone and the more selective aldosterone
antagonist eplerenone have substantial antihypertensive, cardioprotective, and
antiproteinuric effects even at low doses, and in the presence of combined ACEi
and ARB therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors have shown remarkable additional
benefits in delaying CKD progression on top of the standard RAS blockade. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.645187/full
3.
Acute onset CKD:
https://srinaini25.blogspot.com/2021/07/srinaini-roll-no-33-3rd-semester-this.html
a.
Problem list-
i. Lower back pain
ii. Dribbling of urine
iii. Pedal oedema
iv. Shortness of breath
v. Involuntary movements of upper limbs
vi. Slurred speech
vii. Increased tone in lower limb
viii.
Hyperuricemia
ix. Elevated serum creatinine
x. Anaemia
xi. Lymphocytosis
xii. Hyperphosphatemia
xiii.
Spondylodiscitis
b.
Literature review around sensitivity and
specificity of diagnosis- Spondylodiscitis and osteomyelitis are seen in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients
due to repeated vascular access for hemodialysis and urinary tract infections
leading to recurrent bacteremia. Discitis and osteomyelitis are underdiagnosed
due to the nonspecific initial presentation of back pain. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30771765/
c.
Literature review around efficacy of therapeutic
interventions- RAS blockade with
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor
blockers (ARBs) is the cornerstone therapy to reduce proteinuria, CKD
progression, and cardiovascular risk. Renin inhibitor therapy is useful for
individuals intolerant to above therapy. Spironolactone and the more selective
aldosterone antagonist eplerenone have substantial antihypertensive,
cardioprotective, and antiproteinuric effects even at low doses, and in the
presence of combined ACEi and ARB therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors have shown
remarkable additional benefits in delaying CKD progression on top of the
standard RAS blockade. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.645187/full
4.
Coma and
renal failure: https://ananyapulikandala106.blogspot.com/2021/06/a-35yr-old-female-elog.html
a. Problem list-
i. Fever
ii. Diarrhea
iii. Back pain
iv. Type 2 diabetes
mellitus
v. Hyperglycemia
vi. Went into diabetic
ketoacidosis coma
vii. Pyelonephritis
viii.
Lymphocytosis
ix. Anemia
x. Hyperbilirubinemia
xi. Elevated ALP
xii. Uremia
xiii.
Elevated serum creatinine
b.
Literature
review around sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis- MRI is 86.8% sensitive and 87.5% specific. CT 74.3% sensitive and
56.7% specific for diagnosing pyelonephritis. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11152787/
c.
Literature
review around efficacy of therapeutic interventions- “Our successful management of this patient lies
in the following points: 1. We confirmed the diagnosis of EPN by urinary CT
examination as soon as the patient was admitted to hospital; 2. Rapid
correction of ketoacidosis by continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose
insulin and fluid resuscitation; 3. We performed blood culture before using
antibiotics and upgraded cefoperazone sulbactam to meropenem according to the
results of blood culture and the antibiotic-susceptibility test results; 4. Our
endocrinology department collaborated with urology, nephrology, infection and
imaging departments to develop a treatment plan.” https://bmcurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12894-020-0575-0
Comments
Post a Comment